MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort

CoPo: Self-supervised Contrastive Learning for Popularity Prediction in MEC Networks

2023· article· en· W4383219129 on OpenAlexaff
Zohreh Hajiakhondi Meybodi, Arash Mohammadi, Jamshid Abouei, Konstantinos N. Plataniotis

Bibliographic record

Venuenot available
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldPhysics and Astronomy
TopicComplex Network Analysis Techniques
Canadian institutionsUniversity of TorontoConcordia University
Fundersnot available
KeywordsPopularityComputer scienceArtificial intelligenceMachine learningPsychology

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Mobile Edge Caching (MEC) technology aims to provide high-quality multimedia content to mobile users by bringing storage and computation resources closer to the edge of the network. MEC networks, however, face several challenges such as limited storage capacity, dynamic network conditions, and the need for low-latency content delivery. To address these challenges, recent research has focused on integrating MEC networks with Deep Neural Networks (DNNs), in particular, supervised learning models. One significant limitation of supervised popularity prediction models is the requirement for manual labeling of contents as popular or unpopular by investigating users’ past behavior, which can be a time-intensive task. This paper proposes a self-supervised learning algorithm called Contrastive learning Popularity (CoPo) prediction framework to predict the dynamic content popularity in a MEC network. The framework utilizes the distinguishing aspect of the Contrastive Learning (CL) paradigm to recognize differences among input samples, including users’ contextual information and is based on the Long Short Term Memory (LSTM) model to capture temporal information. Simulation results illustrate that the proposed CoPo framework outperforms the self-supervised/unsupervised state-of-the-art methods.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Simulation or modeling · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.898
Threshold uncertainty score0.496

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.001
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.013
GPT teacher head0.264
Teacher spread0.252 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designSimulation or modeling
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations4
Published2023
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same topicComplex Network Analysis TechniquesFrench-language works237,207