MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4383219807 · doi:10.1145/3607479.3607481

SIGCSE Technical Symposium 2023 Report

2023· article· en· W4383219807 on OpenAlexaboutno aff
Maureen Doyle, Ben Stephenson, Brian Dorn, Leen‐Kiat Soh, Lina Battestilli, K Stephens, Delaram Yazdansepas

Bibliographic record

VenueACM SIGCSE Bulletin · 2023
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldDecision Sciences
TopicAcademic Publishing and Open Access
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsAttendanceLibrary scienceCoronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19)Computer sciencePolitical scienceMedicineLaw

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

The 2023 SIGCSE Technical Symposium has come to a close. Thank you, all 1,554 of you, that joined us in Toronto and online for the first-ever SIGCSE Technical Symposium held outside the United States. We enjoyed welcoming 1,354 of you to Canada in person, as well as an additional 200 of you who registered for online attendance. While we didn't set a new attendance record, we did exceed last year's attendance, and look forward to seeing our attendance continue to grow back toward its pre-pandemic levels in 2024.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.013
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.073
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesMetaresearch, Open science, Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)
Consensus categoriesInsufficient payload (model declined to judge)
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Not applicable · Consensus signal: Not applicable
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.429
Threshold uncertainty score0.998

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0130.073
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.000
Bibliometrics0.0010.003
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0010.001
Open science0.0070.003
Research integrity0.0000.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0040.037

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.086
GPT teacher head0.400
Teacher spread0.314 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; both teacher heads agree on what is shown here.

Study designNot applicable
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2023
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueACM SIGCSE BulletinSame topicAcademic Publishing and Open AccessFrench-language works237,207