MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4383221427 · doi:10.1145/3579856.3595799

Cage4Deno: A Fine-Grained Sandbox for Deno Subprocesses

2023· article· en· W4383221427 on OpenAlexfundno aff
Marco Abbadini, Dario Facchinetti, Gianluca Oldani, Matthew Rossi, Stefano Paraboschi

Bibliographic record

Venuenot available
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldComputer Science
TopicSecurity and Verification in Computing
Canadian institutionsnot available
FundersRWTH Aachen UniversityUniversity of Chinese Academy of SciencesSouthwest UniversityNanjing University of Science and TechnologyUniversität zu LübeckUniversity of SurreyHuazhong University of Science and TechnologyGriffith UniversityDeakin UniversityNanyang Technological UniversityNanjing UniversityCommonwealth Scientific and Industrial Research OrganisationEuropean CommissionSungkyunkwan UniversityUniversity College LondonYork UniversityUniversity of WollongongWorcester Polytechnic InstituteUniversity of Technology SydneyChinese Academy of SciencesPurdue UniversityTU Graz, Internationale Beziehungen und Mobilitätsprogramme
KeywordsSandbox (software development)JavaScriptComputer scienceTypeScriptOperating systemCertificateDatabaseProgramming languageComputer security

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Deno is a runtime for JavaScript and TypeScript that is receiving great interest by developers, and is increasingly used for the construction of back-ends of web applications. A primary goal of Deno is to provide a secure and isolated environment for the execution of JavaScript programs. It also supports the execution of subprocesses, unfortunately without providing security guarantees.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.004
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.013
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Bench or experimental · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.023
Threshold uncertainty score0.076

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0040.013
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0020.002
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0020.002
Bibliometrics0.0010.001
Science and technology studies0.0010.003
Scholarly communication0.0040.008
Open science0.0050.009
Research integrity0.0020.004
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0230.011

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.044
GPT teacher head0.302
Teacher spread0.258 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designBench or experimental
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations10
Published2023
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same topicSecurity and Verification in ComputingFrench-language works237,207