POSTER: Leveraging eBPF to enhance sandboxing of WebAssembly runtimes
Why this work is in the frame
A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.
Bibliographic record
Abstract
WebAssembly is a binary instruction format designed as a portable compilation target enabling the deployment of untrusted code in a safe and efficient manner. While it was originally designed to be run inside web browsers, modern runtimes like Wasmtime and WasmEdge can execute WebAssembly directly on various systems. In order to access system resources with a universal hostcall interface, a standardization effort named WebAssembly System Interface (WASI) is currently undergoing. With specific regard to the file system, runtimes must prevent hostcalls to access arbitrary locations, thus they introduce security checks to only permit access to a pre-defined list of directories. This approach not only suffers from poor granularity, it is also error-prone and has led to several security issues. In this work we replace the security checks in hostcall wrappers with eBPF programs, enabling the introduction of fine-grained per-module policies. Preliminary experiments confirm that our approach introduces limited overhead to existing runtimes.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it