Generalized Dicke model and gauge-invariant master equations for two atoms in ultrastrongly-coupled cavity quantum electrodynamics
Bibliographic record
Abstract
We study a generalization of the well-known Dicke model, using two dissimilar atoms in the regime of ultrastrongly-coupled cavity quantum electrodynamics. Our theory uses gauge-invariant master equations, which yields consistent results in either of the standard multipolar and Coulomb gauges, including system-bath interactions for open cavity systems. We first show how a second atom can be treated as a sensor atom to measure the output spectrum from a single atom in the ultrastrong-coupling regime, and compare results with the quantum regression theorem, explaining when they can be different. We then focus on the case where the second atom is also ultrastrongly coupled to the cavity, but with different parameters from those of the first atom, which introduces complex coupling effects and additional resonances and spectral features. In particular, we show multiple resonances in the cavity spectra that are visible off-resonance. We also observe clear anticrossing features, which are particularly pronounced when the second atom is tuned through its resonance.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.002 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.002 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".