Dysregulated Calcium Handling in Cirrhotic Cardiomyopathy
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Cirrhotic cardiomyopathy is a syndrome of blunted cardiac systolic and diastolic function in patients with cirrhosis. However, the mechanisms remain incompletely known. Since contractility and relaxation depend on cardiomyocyte calcium transients, any factors that impact cardiac contractile and relaxation functions act eventually through calcium transients. In addition, calcium transients play an important role in cardiac arrhythmias. The present review summarizes the calcium handling system and its role in cardiac function in cirrhotic cardiomyopathy and its mechanisms. The calcium handling system includes calcium channels on the sarcolemmal plasma membrane of cardiomyocytes, the intracellular calcium-regulatory apparatus, and pertinent proteins in the cytosol. L-type calcium channels, the main calcium channel in the plasma membrane of cardiomyocytes, are decreased in the cirrhotic heart, and the calcium current is decreased during the action potential both at baseline and under stimulation of beta-adrenergic receptors, which reduces the signal to calcium-induced calcium release. The study of sarcomere length fluctuations and calcium transients demonstrated that calcium leakage exists in cirrhotic cardiomyocytes, which decreases the amount of calcium storage in the sarcoplasmic reticulum (SR). The decreased storage of calcium in the SR underlies the reduced calcium released from the SR, which results in decreased cardiac contractility. Based on studies of heart failure with non-cirrhotic cardiomyopathy, it is believed that the calcium leakage is due to the destabilization of interdomain interactions (dispersion) of ryanodine receptors (RyRs). A similar dispersion of RyRs may also play an important role in reduced contractility. Multiple defects in calcium handling thus contribute to the pathogenesis of cirrhotic cardiomyopathy.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.004 | 0.001 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.001 | 0.002 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".