No evidence of a northward biome shift of treeline in the Mackay Lake region, north-central Canada
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Major changes in boreal and subarctic climates have occurred in recent decades, but uncertainty exists as to how biota are responding, e.g., whether the subarctic forest-tundra (‘treeline’) will advance northward. Ground-based vegetation data from the Mackay Lake region of the Northwest Territories were used to determine if there is evidence of a northward biome shift. Near the treeline, current plant communities are similar to those documented 40–67 years ago. There was little or no evidence of recent tree regeneration by seed, expansion of tree stands, or colonization by trees of adjacent tundra. Black spruce stems require ~75 years to reach 2.5 m in height and be discernible as trees on photography and satellite imagery. Branches 20–30 years old are the preferred age for initiation of an upright stem from layering. Upright stems of clonal spruce within the forest-tundra may be far younger than their near-ground or belowground stems. Whether northward biome migration will occur will depend on the interplay between climatic, landscape, and soil factors, species migration capacities, wildfires, and whether afforestation outpaces deforestation. In the forest-tundra, climatic change may not result in significant biome shifts, but rather in changes in the relative abundance of species already present.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".