MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4383269827 · doi:10.25145/j.refiull.2023.46.18

Fraseología aplicada a la adquisición del español como lengua extranjera /

2023· article· en· W4383269827 on OpenAlex

Why this work is in the frame

A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.

affAt least one author lists a Canadian institution in the pinned OpenAlex snapshot.

Bibliographic record

VenueRevista de Filología de la Universidad de La Laguna · 2023
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldArts and Humanities
TopicSpanish Linguistics and Language Studies
Canadian institutionsFraser Health
Fundersnot available
KeywordsTypologyElaborationTask (project management)Point (geometry)Selection (genetic algorithm)Foreign languageComputer scienceLinguisticsPlan (archaeology)PsychologyHumanitiesMathematics educationArtificial intelligenceSociologyArtEngineeringPhilosophyMathematicsHistory

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

This work belongs to the research field of Phraseodidactics applied to the teaching of Spanish as a foreign language (ELE). The objectives of our research are: to present a typology proposal for the different phraseological units, to point out what the selection criteria should be to showcase these lexical units in the classroom, to provide basic guidelines for their teaching, and to present a typology of activities based on the strategies of learning that students must develop, together with the temporal phases through which these structures are learned. As conclusions of the research, it is shown that it is necessary to work on three preferential lines: the data dump of the phraseological units found in the Curricular Plan of the Cervantes Institute, the elaboration of their didactic classification, and the creation of didactic units. Likewise, the creation of specific didactic units for learning about this type of lexical units is considered to be an ensuing task.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.001
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesMeta-epidemiology (narrow), Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Not applicable · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.898
Threshold uncertainty score1.000

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.001
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0010.001
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0010.000
Research integrity0.0000.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0020.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.010
GPT teacher head0.266
Teacher spread0.255 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it