MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4383301511 · doi:10.1093/eurjpc/zwad221

Individual lifetime benefit from low-dose colchicine in patients with chronic coronary artery disease

2023· article· en· W4383301511 on OpenAlexaff
P.M. Burger, Jannick A N Dorresteijn, Aernoud T.L. Fiolet, Stefan Koudstaal, John W. Eikelboom, Stefan M. Nidorf, Peter L. Thompson, Jan H. Cornel, Charley Budgeon, I. C. D. Westendorp, Driek Beelen, Fabrice M A C Martens, Philippe Gabríel Steg, Folkert W. Asselbergs, Maarten J. Cramer, Martin Teraa, Deepak L. Bhatt, Frank L.J. Visseren, Arend Mosterd, Xianfan Xu, M. A. Ireland, Donald Latchem, Alan Whelan, Randall Hendriks, P. Salkani, I.W. Tan, Anna Thompson, Alison Morton, B Hockings, Philip Thompson, Benjamin King, H. Bakker-Lohmeijer, Petra Bunschoten, Salem H.K. The, S. van der Kooi, Timo Lenderink, R Lardinois, Pieter Hoogslag, Alex de Vos, A. Jerzewski, Shirley Jansen, P.R. Nierop, Marjo S. van der Knaap, H. Swart, R. Kingma, Jeroen Schaap, L.B. Blom, A. F. M. Kuijper, Esther Bayraktar-Verver, M. W. J. van Hessen, W. Engelen, J.W.M. van Eck, N. van der Ven-Elzebroek, J.M.C. van Hal, I M J Drost, Frank R. den Hartog, Desiree van Wijk, E Van Beek, C van der Horst, Lambertus W. Bartels, Marleen Elisabeth Hendriks, C. de Nooijer, C.C.M. Welten, Eelko Ronner, Aicha B. C. Dijkshoorn, F.J. Prins, R.N.A. Rutten, David Beele, Ivo A. Hendriks, Aize van der Sluis, E A Badings, A J Melein, Tj.J. Römer, P. Bruines, RMA van de Wal, I. Leenders - van Lieshout, Martin E W Hemels, K. Meinen-Werner, Marco R. de Groot, G.B. Post, M.W.C. Mulder, Sandra Stuij, Egbert H. van Nes, Patrick Luyten, Jacobus Plomp, S.V. Veldmeijer, M. Asselman, Patricia Scholtus, Manon G. van der Meer, Hendrik M. Nathoe, Gert J. de Borst, Michiel L. Bots, Mariëlle H. Emmelot‐Vonk, Pim A. de Jong, A. Titia Lely, Niels P. van der Kaaij, L. Jaap Kappelle, Ynte M. Ruigrok, Marianne C. Verhaar, E. Magnus Ohman, Peter W.F. Wilson, Mark J. Alberts, Ralph B. D’Agostino, Kim A. Eagle, Shinya Goto, A T Hirsch, J.‐L. Mas, Sidney C. Smith

Bibliographic record

VenueEuropean Journal of Preventive Cardiology · 2023
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldBiochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology
TopicInflammasome and immune disorders
Canadian institutionsMcMaster University
FundersNational Health and Medical Research CouncilWorld Heart FederationTeva Pharmaceutical IndustriesMedical Research CouncilSanofiBristol-Myers Squibb
KeywordsMaceMedicineInterquartile rangeInternal medicineCoronary artery diseaseMyocardial infarctionCardiologyCohortColchicineGuidelineSurgeryPercutaneous coronary interventionPathology

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

AIMS: Low-dose colchicine reduces cardiovascular risk in patients with coronary artery disease (CAD), but absolute benefits may vary between individuals. This study aimed to assess the range of individual absolute benefits from low-dose colchicine according to patient risk profile. METHODS AND RESULTS: The European Society of Cardiology (ESC) guideline-recommended SMART-REACH model was combined with the relative treatment effect of low-dose colchicine and applied to patients with CAD from the Low-Dose Colchicine 2 (LoDoCo2) trial and the Utrecht Cardiovascular Cohort-Second Manifestations of ARTerial disease (UCC-SMART) study (n = 10 830). Individual treatment benefits were expressed as 10-year absolute risk reductions (ARRs) for myocardial infarction, stroke, or cardiovascular death (MACE), and MACE-free life-years gained. Predictions were also performed for MACE plus coronary revascularization (MACE+), using a new lifetime model derived in the REduction of Atherothrombosis for Continued Health (REACH) registry. Colchicine was compared with other ESC guideline-recommended intensified (Step 2) prevention strategies, i.e. LDL cholesterol (LDL-c) reduction to 1.4 mmol/L and systolic blood pressure (SBP) reduction to 130 mmHg. The generalizability to other populations was assessed in patients with CAD from REACH North America and Western Europe (n = 25 812). The median 10-year ARR from low-dose colchicine was 4.6% [interquartile range (IQR) 3.6-6.0%] for MACE and 8.6% (IQR 7.6-9.8%) for MACE+. Lifetime benefit was 2.0 (IQR 1.6-2.5) MACE-free years, and 3.4 (IQR 2.6-4.2) MACE+-free life-years gained. For LDL-c and SBP reduction, respectively, the median 10-year ARR for MACE was 3.0% (IQR 1.5-5.1%) and 1.7% (IQR 0.0-5.7%), and the lifetime benefit was 1.2 (IQR 0.6-2.1) and 0.7 (IQR 0.0-2.3) MACE-free life-years gained. Similar results were obtained for MACE+ and in American and European patients from REACH. CONCLUSION: The absolute benefits of low-dose colchicine vary between individual patients with chronic CAD. They may be expected to be of at least similar magnitude to those of intensified LDL-c and SBP reduction in a majority of patients already on conventional lipid-lowering and blood pressure-lowering therapy.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: Observational
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.034
Threshold uncertainty score0.580

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.005
GPT teacher head0.200
Teacher spread0.195 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designObservational
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations16
Published2023
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueEuropean Journal of Preventive CardiologySame topicInflammasome and immune disordersFrench-language works237,207