MétaCan
Menu
← Back to cohort
Record W4383302776 · doi:10.4212/cjhp.3349

Characterizing the Use of Nabiximols (∆9-Tetrahydrocannabinol–Cannabidiol) Buccal Spray in Pediatric Patients

2023· article· en· W4383302776 on OpenAlexaffvenueabout
Lianne Hagg, Sarah Leung, Roxane Carr

Bibliographic record

VenueThe Canadian Journal of Hospital Pharmacy · 2023
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldMedicine
TopicCannabis and Cannabinoid Research
Canadian institutionsUniversity of British ColumbiaBC Children's Hospital
Fundersnot available
KeywordsCannabidiolΔ9-tetrahydrocannabinolTetrahydrocannabinolBuccal administrationDronabinolMedicinePharmacologyCannabisInternal medicineCannabinoidPsychiatry

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Background: Nabiximols is a commercially available cannabinoid buccal spray containing 2.7 mg ∆9-tetrahydrocannabinol (THC) and 2.5 mg cannabidiol (CBD) per spray. It is approved by Health Canada for adults with cancer pain or spasticity/neuropathic pain related to multiple sclerosis. Despite a lack of published studies regarding the use of nabiximols in children, it is being used in clinical practice for indications of pain, nausea/vomiting, and spasticity. Objective: To describe the use of nabiximols in children. Methods: This retrospective single-cohort study involved hospitalized pediatric patients who received at least 1 dose of nabiximols between January 2005 and August 2018. Descriptive statistical analyses were performed. Results: A total of 34 patients were included. The median age was 14 (range 0.6–18) years, and 11 patients (32%) were admitted under the oncology service. The median dose of nabiximols was 1.9 (range 0.3–10.8) sprays per day, and the median duration was 3.8 (range 1–213) days. Nabiximols was most commonly used to treat pain and nausea/vomiting and was most frequently prescribed by pain specialists. Perceived effectiveness was documented in 17 (50%) of the cases, with variable results being reported. The most commonly reported adverse effects were drowsiness and tachycardia (3/34, 9%, for each). Conclusion: In this study, nabiximols was prescribed for children in all age groups, for a variety of conditions, but most commonly for pain and nausea/vomiting. Further study, in the form of a large, prospective randomized controlled trial with clearly defined efficacy and safety end points for nausea/vomiting and/or pain, is needed to determine whether nabiximols is effective and safe in children. RÉSUMÉ Contexte : Le nabiximols est un vaporisateur buccal cannabinoïde disponible dans le commerce qui contient 2,7 mg de ∆9-tetrahydrocannabinol [THC] et 2,5 mg de cannabidiol [CBD] par vaporisation. Il est approuvé par Santé Canada pour les adultes souffrant de douleur cancéreuse ou de spasticité/douleur neuropathique liée à la sclérose en plaques. Malgré le manque d’études publiées concernant l’utilisation du nabiximols chez les enfants, il est utilisé en pratique clinique pour des indications de douleur, de nausées/vomissements et de spasticité. Objectif : Décrire l’utilisation du nabiximols chez les enfants. Méthodes : Cette étude rétrospective à cohorte unique comprenait des patients pédiatriques hospitalisés ayant reçu au moins 1 dose de nabiximols entre janvier 2005 et août 2018. Des analyses statistiques descriptives ont été réalisées. Résultats : Au total, 34 patients ont été inclus. L’âge médian était de 14 ans [intervalle de 0,6 à 18 ans] et 11 enfants (32 %) étaient des patients en oncologie. La dose médiane de nabiximols était de 1,9 [intervalle de 0,3 à 10,8] vaporisation par jour et la durée médiane était de 3,8 [intervalle de 1 à 213] jours. Le nabiximols était le plus couramment utilisé pour traiter la douleur et les nausées/vomissements et était le plus souvent prescrit par des spécialistes de la douleur. L’efficacité perçue a été documentée dans 17 (50 %) des cas, avec des résultats variables rapportés. Les effets indésirables le plus fréquemment rapportés étaient la somnolence et la tachycardie (3/34, 9 % chacun). Conclusion : Dans cette étude, le nabiximols a été prescrit à des enfants de toutes les tranches d’âge, pour diverses pathologies, mais le plus souvent pour des douleurs et des nausées/vomissements. Une étude plus approfondie, sous la forme d’un vaste essai contrôlé randomisé prospectif avec des paramètres d’efficacité et d’innocuité clairement définis pour les nausées/vomissements et/ou la douleur, est nécessaire pour déterminer si le nabiximols est efficace et sûr chez les enfants.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.002
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: Observational
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.003
Threshold uncertainty score0.006

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.002
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0010.001
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0010.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0010.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.045
GPT teacher head0.301
Teacher spread0.256 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designObservational
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations3
Published2023
Admission routes3
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueThe Canadian Journal of Hospital Pharmacy→Same topicCannabis and Cannabinoid Research→French-language works237,207→