MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4383312694 · doi:10.1002/glia.24418

Orals

2023· article· it· W4383312694 on OpenAlexfundno aff

Bibliographic record

VenueGlia · 2023
Typearticle
Languageit
FieldNeuroscience
TopicNeurogenesis and neuroplasticity mechanisms
Canadian institutionsnot available
FundersAir Force Office of Scientific ResearchNational Institute of Neurological Disorders and StrokeEuropean Regional Development FundSchool of Medicine, Shanghai Jiao Tong UniversityNational Medical Research CouncilMedical Research CouncilHorizon 2020 Framework ProgrammeNational Institutes of HealthJunta de Castilla y LeónNemzeti Kutatási Fejlesztési és Innovációs HivatalMinistry of Education, IndiaMinisterio de Economía y CompetitividadCongressionally Directed Medical Research ProgramsFundação para a Ciência e a TecnologiaZonMwAgencia Estatal de InvestigaciónSchweizerischer Nationalfonds zur Förderung der Wissenschaftlichen ForschungVetenskapsrådetShanghai Educational Development FoundationGeneralitat ValencianaInstitut National de la Santé et de la Recherche MédicaleNational Science FoundationScience Foundation IrelandUniversity of EdinburghArmy Research LaboratoryInstituto de Salud Carlos IIIUniversity of Texas at AustinNational University of SingaporeNational Research FoundationWellcome TrustHope Center for Neurological DisordersUniversity College LondonChildren’s Hospital of Wisconsin Research InstituteMultiple Sclerosis SocietyHereditary Disease FoundationHuntington Society of CanadaMichael Smith Health Research BCBC Children's HospitalU.S. Air ForceDeutsche ForschungsgemeinschaftNational Multiple Sclerosis SocietyEuropean CommissionU.S. Department of Defense
KeywordsCitationLibrary scienceBiologyComputer science

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Development, differentiation and maintenance of the differentiated state of glial cells require a cell type-specific gene regulatory network that is both definitive enough to secure cell identity and at the same time flexible enough to allow lineage progression and adequate responses to external stimuli.This requires cooperative and cross-regulatory activities of cell type-specific and stage-specific transcription factors, their interactions with histone modifying and chromatin remodeling machineries as well as with components of the basic transcription machinery, and multiple functional interactions with non-coding regulatory RNAs.The HMG-domain transcription factor Sox10 is the only known lineage determining transcription factor in both myelinating Schwann cells and oligodendrocytes.It does not only provide an excellent tool to analyze important gene regulatory events in myelinating glia but also allows to compare networks between Schwann cells and oligodendrocytes.I will present examples of the relation and interplay of Sox10 with other transcription factors, chromatin modifying complexes and microRNAs to illustrate our current understanding of network activity and function in myelinating glia, but also point to limitations and future directions in this important field of study.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.003
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesInsufficient payload (model declined to judge)
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Not applicable · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Other · Consensus signal: Other
Teacher disagreement score0.307
Threshold uncertainty score0.000

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.003
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.001
Bibliometrics0.0020.001
Science and technology studies0.0020.001
Scholarly communication0.0040.002
Open science0.0020.003
Research integrity0.0030.002
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.6930.449

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.073
GPT teacher head0.292
Teacher spread0.219 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

Study designNot applicable
Domainnot available
GenreOther

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2023
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueGliaSame topicNeurogenesis and neuroplasticity mechanismsFrench-language works237,207