Improvement of Spiritual Well-Being in Students Experiencing Quarter Life Crisis through Solution-Focus Brief Therapy
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Postgraduate students are defined as individuals who continue their studies at the master’s level at a tertiary institution, both public and private or an institution that is equivalent to a tertiary institution. This adult development phase is the phase that has the lowest level of spiritual well-being compared to other developmental phases where individuals do not have spiritual beliefs that can be used as a coping mechanism to overcome problems, especially problems experienced during the quarter-life crisis phase. This study aimed to determine the effect of a solution-focused brief therapy (SFBT) intervention on the spiritual well-being of postgraduate students experiencing a quarter-life crisis. This research is very important for groups of young adults who experience quarter-life crises to help provide information and skills in dealing with quarter-life crises. The research method used is quasi-experiment. Based on the results of the research that has been done, brief solution-focused therapy is proven to be able to improve the spiritual well-being of postgraduate students who are experiencing a quarter-life crisis. Increased spiritual well-being gives graduate students more positive self-assessments and reduces anxiety so that their quarter-life crisis rate decreases. Based on the description, it can be concluded that short therapy focused on solutions improves the spiritual well-being of postgraduate students experiencing a quarter-life crisis. Subjects who were given brief therapy focused on solutions felt changes in themselves, and complaints such as low self-esteem, pessimism, and anxiety could be resolved. The decrease in these complaints made the subject more optimistic so that the quarter-life crisis could be resolved. Received: 17 May 2023 / Accepted: 20 June 2023 / Published: 5 July 2023
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.003 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".