MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4383340723 · doi:10.1016/j.jiec.2023.07.004

Tri-functionalized electrolyte additive as an interfacial stabilizer for lithium metal anodes

2023· article· en· W4383340723 on OpenAlexfundno aff
Ye Jin Jeon, Subin Lee, Kicheol Kim, Jeong Ae Yoon, Taeeun Yim

Bibliographic record

VenueJournal of Industrial and Engineering Chemistry · 2023
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEngineering
TopicAdvanced Battery Materials and Technologies
Canadian institutionsnot available
FundersNational Research Foundation of KoreaMinistry of EducationCHEO Research Institute
KeywordsElectrolyteElectrochemistryLithium (medication)AnodeMetalChemistryAcetalInorganic chemistryImideIonic conductivityLithium metalChemical engineeringMaterials sciencePolymer chemistryElectrodeOrganic chemistryPhysical chemistry

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Li metal has received noticeable interest as a post-anode material, however, many critical hurdles remain in its application in conventional batteries. Herein, we have designed and prepared an additive, the AF, that is functionalized by three individual functional groups: vinyl-, bis(fluorosulfonyl)imide-, and acetal functional groups. The AF-additive promotes forming solid-electrolyte interphase (SEI) layers at the Li metal interface via electrochemical reduction at a higher potential than that found in the carbonate-based electrolyte, which is predominately composed of inorganic species, such as lithium fluoride, rather than polycarbonate. The ionic conductivity of the electrolyte with the AF-additive is well retained even when the amount of AF-additive is increased because the acetal functional group may form acetal–Li + complexes, which encourages Li + migration. The AF-additive controlled electrolyte offers improved cycling retention in the both Li/Li symmetric cell and Li/NCM cell because the AF-additive not only effectively suppresses electrolyte decomposition at the interface of Li metal but also inhibits the formation of Li dendrites based on enhanced Li metal stability.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Bench or experimental · Consensus signal: Bench or experimental
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.033
Threshold uncertainty score0.574

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.020
GPT teacher head0.232
Teacher spread0.213 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designBench or experimental
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations1
Published2023
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueJournal of Industrial and Engineering ChemistrySame topicAdvanced Battery Materials and TechnologiesFrench-language works237,207