MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4383341964 · doi:10.5194/ems2023-417

Assessing the Potential and Limitations of Deep Learning for Solar Irradiance Nowcasting across Large Geographical Areas

2023· preprint· en· W4383341964 on OpenAlexaff
Hadrien Verbois, Yves‐Marie Saint‐Drenan, Philippe Blanc

Bibliographic record

Venuenot available
Typepreprint
Languageen
FieldComputer Science
TopicSolar Radiation and Photovoltaics
Canadian institutionsImpact
Fundersnot available
KeywordsNowcastingComputer scienceDeep learningSolar irradianceIrradianceArtificial intelligenceConsistency (knowledge bases)Optical flowMachine learningMeteorologyGeography

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

In energy systems with a high share of renewable energy supply (RES), accurate forecasting methods are very important for a secure and economical energy supply. For applications such as demand-supply balancing, short-term forecast (nowcasting) of spatial RES power generation is particularly important. In the literature, most models addressing this need use satellite-derived SSI estimations as input and optical flow or block-matching algorithms to predict their motion. Recently, new families of algorithms based on deep learning have appeared with great potential for improving the performance of nowcasting systems. It is thus of relevance to assess and understand the potential and limitations of deep learning approaches. Furthermore, when maps of solar irradiance are predicted, the metrics used to evaluate the forecasts are usually computed pixel-wise and thus ignore important spatial features, such as the consistency of spatial variability and spatial resolution. In this work, we investigate the potential of deep-learning algorithms for the forecasting of maps of 15-min solar surface irradiance (SSI) over short-term horizons, from nowcasts of SSI provided by CAMS radiation. We focus on a state-of-the-art deep learning model, designed for spatio-temporal processes: the convolutional long-term short-term network (ConvLSTM). We compare it to a “classic” forecasting model, based on an optical-flow algorithm (TVL1). We first perform a pixel-wise analysis of the models’ accuracy for forecasting horizons between 15 minutes and 3 hours. We then use Fourier spectral analysis to quantify the impact of each forecasting model on the spatial features of the SSI. Finally, we investigate the impact of the loss function used to train the convLSTM. Our results show that convLSTM and TVL1 have similar pixel-wise performances for short time horizons (15 and 30 minutes ahead), whereas, for larger horizons, convLSTM has a significantly lower RMSE and higher correlation. Fourier analysis, however, reveals that this improvement in pixel-wise accuracy comes with a degradation of the spatial features of SSI. TVL1 forecasts indeed have realistic spatial variability for all tested horizons, but convLSTM produces increasingly smooth predictions: for horizons beyond 2 hours, and despite its higher accuracy, convLSTM acts as a low-pass filter and fully ignores high spatial frequencies. This shows that the gains in accuracy are obtained at the expense of the fine spatial structure, which is a well-known phenomenon in forecasting. However, highlighting and quantifying this effect is important because smoothing can be problematic in some applications such as variability or ramp forecasting. Using hybrid loss functions penalizing the lack of variability in the forecasts indeed improves the spatial behavior of the deep-learning model without significantly reducing its pixel-wise performance. At large forecast horizons, however, such hybrid loss functions cannot prevent a substantial loss of spatial variability and convLSTM predictions remain overly smooth.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.001
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Simulation or modeling · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.905
Threshold uncertainty score0.925

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.001
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0010.000
Scholarly communication0.0010.000
Open science0.0010.001
Research integrity0.0000.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.076
GPT teacher head0.333
Teacher spread0.257 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designSimulation or modeling
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2023
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same topicSolar Radiation and PhotovoltaicsFrench-language works237,207