Bibliographic record
Abstract
Group field theory (GFT) models for quantum gravity coupled to a massless scalar field give rise to cosmological models that reproduce the (expanding or contracting) dynamics of homogeneous and isotropic spacetimes in general relativity at low energies, while including high-energy corrections that lead to singularity resolution by a ``bounce.'' Here we investigate two possibilities for obtaining stationary solutions in GFT cosmology, which could be useful as an analog of Minkowski spacetime. We first focus on a limit in which interactions are neglected and the effective Newton's constant in GFT cosmology is taken to zero. In this limit, we derive an effective Friedmann equation that shows no stationary solutions but departures from the trivial classical dynamics falling off rapidly, similar to the usual correction terms responsible for the bounce. Since the effective Newton's constant needs to be exactly zero, the scenario is fine-tuned. A more satisfactory approach is obtained in a weakly interacting model: we find bound states with sharply peaked volume, representing a stationary semiclassical cosmology, and show that coherent states peaked around the minimum of the potential remain stable with small quantum fluctuations, and only small oscillations around a nearly constant volume. These coherent states realize the idea of a ``quantum gravity condensate.''
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.001 | 0.003 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.001 | 0.002 |
| Open science | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Research integrity | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".