MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4383373871 · doi:10.5194/ems2023-240

A new guidance on measuring, modelling and monitoring the canopy layer urban heat island

2023· preprint· en· W4383373871 on OpenAlexaff
K. Heinke Schlünzen, Sue Grimmond, Alexander Baklanov, Alberto Martilli, Valéry Masson, Shiguang Miao, Chao Ren, Matthias Roth, Iain Stewart

Bibliographic record

Venuenot available
Typepreprint
Languageen
FieldEnvironmental Science
TopicUrban Heat Island Mitigation
Canadian institutionsUniversity of Toronto
FundersNatural Environment Research CouncilSight Research UK
KeywordsUrban heat islandEnvironmental scienceUrbanizationUrban climateUrban climatologyClimate changeClimatologyMicroclimateGlobal warmingMeteorologyAtmospheric sciencesGeography

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Urbanization influences the local climate by changing the natural surface energy balance affecting the regional temperature field. One of the best-known and widely studied phenomenon is the canopy layer urban heat island (CL-UHI) which is found in cities of all sizes. Specifically, night-time temperatures are often higher in urban areas than in the surrounding rural areas. The CL-UHI characteristics differ between cities, within a city and with time of the day and the season. Climate change induced warming in cities is similar to that experienced in rural areas, but modified by the CL-UHI. The CL-UHI is an additional heat burden on top of background anthropogenic warming, and therefore an increasing focus of urban planners. Given this development, and in response to the request of the 18th World Meteorological Congress (Resolutions 32 and 61), experts from WMO GAW (Global Atmosphere Watch) Urban Research Meteorology and Environment (GURME) initiated in 2020 an expert team inviting more than 30 world-wide experts to contribute to a guidance on measuring, modelling and monitoring the CL-UHI [1]. Topics include a clear definition of the CL-UHI and clarifications of what it is not, causes of the CL-UHI (e.g. meteorological and morphological influences), methods to assess the CL-UHI intensity (measurements, modelling approaches) as well as CL-UHI application examples. The guidance also explains why the CL-UHI mitigation is only part of an answer to reduce urban heat problems. The guidance will serve as a useful reference for meteorologists, climatologists, meteorological administrative staff, and others interested in the CL-UHI. [1] WMO (2023): Guidance on Measuring, Modelling and Monitoring the Canopy Layer Urban Heat Island (CL-UHI). K.H. Schlünzen, S. Grimmond, A. Baklanov (edts.), World Meteorological Organisation, WEATHER CLIMATE WATER. 2023 edition. WMO-No. 1292, pp.88. https://library.wmo.int/doc_num.php?explnum_id=11537 last used 11.04.2023

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.006
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.016
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Theoretical or conceptual · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Methods · Consensus signal: Methods
Teacher disagreement score0.043
Threshold uncertainty score0.085

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0060.016
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0030.001
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.002
Bibliometrics0.0030.002
Science and technology studies0.0010.001
Scholarly communication0.0030.003
Open science0.0040.003
Research integrity0.0080.005
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0160.016

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.073
GPT teacher head0.251
Teacher spread0.178 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designTheoretical or conceptual
Domainnot available
GenreMethods

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations5
Published2023
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same topicUrban Heat Island MitigationFrench-language works237,207