MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4383378333 · doi:10.1353/ras.2023.a900791

Belitung, the afterlives of a shipwreck by Natali Pearson (review)

2023· article· en· W4383378333 on OpenAlexaboutno aff
Yolande Crowe

Bibliographic record

VenueJournal of the Malaysian Branch of the Royal Asiatic Society · 2023
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldArts and Humanities
TopicMaritime and Coastal Archaeology
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsExhibitionQuarter (Canadian coin)HistoryArchaeologyGeography

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Reviewed by: Belitung, the afterlives of a shipwreck by Natali Pearson Yolande Crowe Belitung, the afterlives of a shipwreck. By Natali Pearson. Honolulu: University of Hawai’i Press, 2023. 208 pp. ISBN: 9780824892968 Seldom has the survival of a wreck created such a flurry of debates. The publication of Belitung: the afterlives of a shipwreck a quarter of a century after the wreck’s first mention, emphasises the need to explain the reasons for numerous survivals in the shape of controversial discussions in print, meetings as well as eight important exhibitions, notwithstanding the acquisition of most of the shipwreck’s content for US$32 million by the Sentosa Development Corporation of Singapore in 2005. Finally, the slow process of finding for it an academically respectable home ended with the anchoring of the now called ‘Tang shipwreck’ in 2015 at the Asian Civilisations Museum in Singapore. According to retrieved Chinese coinage and a signed Chinese Changsha ceramic, the Arabian dhow would have sunk around 830 CE. These afterlives have now received a thorough survey by Dr Natali Pearson,3 a keen defender of underwater heritage off the Eastern and South Eastern coasts of Asia and Australia. As emphasised by the text and its ample bibliography, there exists many ways to inform the afterlives of the Belitung wreck including references to UNESCO standards. The author has thus presented her research in five chapters, preceded by an introduction concerned with underwater cultural heritage as well as the place of museum policies and their ethics. The first chapter, ‘Created’, covers the fabric of the boat, its sailing along the maritime ceramic road, the people and goods aboard ship. The second chapter, ‘Wrecked’, describes the site of its discovery and its archaeological problems in Indonesian waters. ‘Provenanced’, the third chapter, deals with the salvage, its conservation in New Zealand and the selling of the cargo to the Sentosa Development Corporation in 2005. The fourth chapter covers its ‘Contested’ destiny, arguing over its earthly survival, and the construction of a similar dhow the Jewel of Muscat, mostly relying on archaeological evidence, which sailed from Oman to Singapore in 2010. In the fifth chapter ‘Reimagined’, some of the Belitung cargo, now called the Tang, was exhibited around the world, before coming to rest in the Singapore Ancient Civilisations Museum. The conclusion deals with the final settlement of these fabulous remains. ‘Shipwrecked: Tang treasures and Monsoon winds’ was the title for the first exhibition of some of the Belitung wreck’s recoveries. It opened on 8 March 2011 at [End Page 161] the ArtScience Museum in Singapore.4 The catalogue published at the same time, was a joint effort with the Freer Gallery of Art, the art museum of the Smithsonian Institution in Washington DC. The exhibition was to move to Washington. Yet by the end of June the Smithsonian and later cancelled the event altogether. Being a member of the Council of American Maritime Museums, the Smithsonian felt that exhibiting artefacts which had been removed from a commercially exploited site, would amount to approving of treasure hunting. In the case of the Belitung wreck, it had been discovered in 1998 by local fishermen off the east coast of Sumatra close to the tin-producing island of Belitung. With the agreement of the Philippine government, the wreck was explored by Seabed Explorations NZ Ltd. Tilman Walterfang, its founder owner kept together the cargo recovered by Michael Flecker. There was no dismantling by auction as was the case in 1977 with the Witte Leeuw, a VOC vessel dated 1613. On the contrary Walterfang organised a team of world specialists to record, clean and analyse the finds before the first exhibition in Singapore. Well before the Smithsonian veto, two other impressive shipwrecks had come to light: the VOC Witte Leeuw, and the San Diego, exhibited in Paris during the winter of 1994–95 at the Grande Halle de la Villette. Some 5000 artefacts were rescued from the latter, a Spanish galleon which had sunk in Manila Bayin 1600. Neither shipwreck seems to have been referred to in the afterlives of the Belitung. The details of their destinies could have shown other ways of approaching the recovery of a shipwreck by...

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Not applicable · Consensus signal: Not applicable
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.205
Threshold uncertainty score0.751

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.001
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.001
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0010.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0010.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.010
GPT teacher head0.203
Teacher spread0.194 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designNot applicable
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2023
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueJournal of the Malaysian Branch of the Royal Asiatic SocietySame topicMaritime and Coastal ArchaeologyFrench-language works237,207