MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4383427347 · doi:10.35659/designis.i38p141-150

Hibridaciones del arte y el diseño

2023· article· es· W4383427347 on OpenAlexaff
María Ledesma, Nidia Maidana

Bibliographic record

VenuedeSignis · 2023
Typearticle
Languagees
FieldSocial Sciences
TopicAdvertising and Communication Studies
Canadian institutionsEmera (Canada)
Fundersnot available
KeywordsHumanitiesArt

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

El artículo se ocupa de la descripción e interpretación de los procesos de hibridación entre arte y diseño, y analiza los modos en que se producen las transferencias, deslizamientos y apropiaciones entre esos campos desde conceptos semióticos peirceanos. Con la observación de dos producciones de artistas latinoamericanos, se infieren modos particulares de hibridación centrados en aspectos formales, en técnicas vinculadas a los soportes o en procedimientos comunicacionales, que, a su vez, ejemplifican las variantes entre las condiciones productivas, los circuitos de legitimación, los contratos de lectura y los colectivos de interpretación propios de cada uno de los campos.p.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.003
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.004
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Not applicable · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.011
Threshold uncertainty score0.027

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0030.004
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0030.002
Science and technology studies0.0040.025
Scholarly communication0.0110.008
Open science0.0010.005
Research integrity0.0020.002
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0060.001

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.072
GPT teacher head0.378
Teacher spread0.307 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designNot applicable
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2023
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venuedeSignisSame topicAdvertising and Communication StudiesFrench-language works237,207