Bibliographic record
Abstract
Po mnenju Elinor Fuchs je glavna značilnost postmodernega gledališča in potemtakem osnovni razlog za zaton dramskega besedila kot najpomembnejše prvine klasičnega gledališča smrt dramskega značaja. Medtem ko tradicionalni hegeljanski pogled na dramo temelji na enotnem fiktivnem subjektu, piše Fuchs, pa tako moderno kot postmoderno gledališče tak subjekt destabilizirata in sprevračata do te mere, da ga ne moremo več obravnavati kot celoto. A podobno kot Lehmannova ima tudi njena teorija vsaj eno opazno metodološko pomanjkljivost: skoraj popolnoma prezre komedijo. Fuchs se v svoji razčlembi izogne precejšnjemu deležu repertoarja institucionalnih pa tudi alternativnih in eksperimentalnih gledališč. Pričujoča razprava poskuša odpraviti to pomanjkljivost in ugotoviti, ali značaj izgine tudi iz postdramske komedije in ne le iz postdramske resne dramatike. Pri tem se osredotoča na tri podzvrsti postmoderne komedije, ki odstopajo od tradicionalnega pripovednega vzorca in na prvi pogled potrjujejo interpretacije Elinor Fuchs: na skeč komedijo, standup komedijo in improvizacijsko komedijo. Prvi del prispevka se posveča analizi nekaj značilnih prizorov iz skeč komedije Onkraj obrobja (Beyond the Fringe), standup rutin Georgea Carlina in improgledališča Drugo mesto (The Second City). Drugi del ponuja protiargument ter možno dopolnilo k njenim hipotezam.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.002 | 0.006 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.005 | 0.012 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.009 | 0.006 |
| Open science | 0.001 | 0.006 |
| Research integrity | 0.002 | 0.004 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.031 | 0.003 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".