Altered spread of waves of activities at large scale is influenced by cortical thickness organization in temporal lobe epilepsy: a MRI-hdEEG study
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Temporal lobe epilepsy (TLE) is a brain network disorder characterized by alterations at both the structural and the functional level. It remains unclear how structure and function are related and whether this has any clinical relevance. In the present work, we adopted a novel methodological approach investigating how network structural features influence the large-scale dynamics. The functional network was defined by the spatio-temporal spreading of aperiodic bursts of activations (neuronal avalanches), as observed utilizing high-density electroencephalography (hdEEG) in TLE patients. The structural network was modeled as the region-based thickness covariance. Loosely speaking, we quantified the similarity of the cortical thickness of any two brain regions, both across groups, and at the individual level, the latter utilizing a novel approach to define the personalized covariance network (pCN). In order to compare the structural and functional networks (at the nodal level), we studied the correlation between the probability that a wave of activity would propagate from a source to a target region, and the similarity of the source region thickness as compared to other target brain regions. Building on the recent evidence that large-waves of activities pathologically spread through the epileptogenic network in TLE, also during resting state, we hypothesize that the structural cortical organization might influence such altered spatio-temporal dynamics. We observed a stable cluster of structure-function correlation in the bilateral limbic areas across subjects, highlighting group specific features for left, right and bilateral TLE. The involvement of contralateral areas was observed in unilateral TLE. We showed that in temporal lobe epilepsy alterations of structural and functional networks pair in the regions where seizures propagate and are linked to disease severity. In this study we leveraged on a well-defined model of neurological disease and pushed forward personalization approaches potentially useful in clinical practice. Finally, the methods developed here could be exploited to investigate the relationship between structure-function networks at subject level in other neurological conditions.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".