MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4383499591 · doi:10.1126/sciadv.adg4730

Bound chiral magnonic polariton states for ideal microwave isolation

2023· article· en· W4383499591 on OpenAlexafffund
Youcai Han, Changhao Meng, Hong Pan, Jie Qian, Zejin Rao, C.‐M. Hu, Zhenghua An

Bibliographic record

VenueScience Advances · 2023
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldPhysics and Astronomy
TopicQuantum Mechanics and Non-Hermitian Physics
Canadian institutionsUniversity of Manitoba
FundersChina Scholarship CouncilScience and Technology Commission of Shanghai MunicipalityNatural Sciences and Engineering Research Council of CanadaNational Natural Science Foundation of China
KeywordsPhysicsMagnonicsBound stateQuantum mechanics

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Bound states in the continuum (BICs) present a unique solution for eliminating radiation loss. So far, most reported BICs are observed in transmission spectra, with only a few exceptions being in reflection spectra. The correlation between reflection BICs (r-BICs) and transmission BICs (t-BICs) remains unclear. Here, we report the presence of both r-BICs and t-BICs in a three-mode cavity magnonics. We develop a generalized framework of non-Hermitian scattering Hamiltonians to explain the observed bidirectional r-BICs and unidirectional t-BICs. In addition, we find the emergence of an ideal isolation point in the complex frequency plane, where the isolation direction can be switched by fine frequency detuning, thanks to chiral symmetry protection. Our results demonstrate the potential of cavity magnonics and also extend the conventional BICs theory through the application of a more generalized effective Hamiltonians theory. This work offers an alternative idea for designing functional devices in general wave optics.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Theoretical or conceptual · Consensus signal: Theoretical or conceptual
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.466
Threshold uncertainty score0.423

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.001
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.001
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.012
GPT teacher head0.290
Teacher spread0.278 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designTheoretical or conceptual
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations21
Published2023
Admission routes2
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueScience AdvancesSame topicQuantum Mechanics and Non-Hermitian PhysicsFrench-language works237,207