SPAT: Surface Protein Annotation Tool
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Abstract Given the particular attractivity of antibody-based immunotherapies, in vitro experimental approaches aiming to identify and quantify proteins directly located at the cell surface, such as the surfaceome, have been recently developed and improved. However, the “surface” enriched, yet noisy output obtained from available methods makes it challenging to accurately evaluate which proteins are more likely to be located at the surface of the plasma membrane and which are simple contaminants. To that purpose, we developed the in silico Surface Protein Annotation Tool (SPAT), which unifies established annotations to grade proteins according to the chance they have to be located at the cell surface. SPAT accuracy was tested using in-house acute myeloid leukemia data, as well as public datasets, and despite using publicly available annotations, showed good performances when compared to more complex surfaceome predictors. Given its simple input requirement, SPAT is easily usable for the annotation of any gene/protein lists. Its output, in addition to the “surface” score, provides additional annotations including a “secretion” flag, references to verified antibodies targeting annotated proteins, as well as expression data and protein levels in essential human organs, making it a user-friendly tool for the community.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.002 | 0.006 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.003 | 0.001 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.001 | 0.002 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.005 | 0.004 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.002 | 0.002 |
| Open science | 0.002 | 0.002 |
| Research integrity | 0.001 | 0.002 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.022 | 0.023 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".