Classification of Herring, Salmon, and Bubbles in Multifrequency Echograms Using U-Net Neural Networks
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Echosounders are used by fisheries and ocean observatories, but significant manual effort is required to classify species of interest within multifrequency echograms. This article investigates the use of modified U-Net convolutional neural networks for the pixel-level classification of biological and physical data in echogram images with accurate classification of herring and salmon schools, bubbles, and the sea surface. Data were collected on the coast of British Columbia, Canada, over two years using an Acoustic Zooplankton and Fish Profiler at four frequencies (67, 125, 200, 455 kHz). In addition, simulated data (water depth and solar elevation angle) provide spatial and temporal context to improve the quality of predictions. Redundancy is built into the model by using a tiling strategy during training and classification. During training, using a limited set of annotated data, translational augmentation encodes the U-Nets with robust features that enable applications for alternate deployment configurations (lower sampling rates or alternate water depths). To ensure broad applicability, these networks were trained to classify echograms with noise left intact. The best-performing model classifies herring, salmon, and bubble classes with$\rm {F_{1}}$scores of 93.0%, 87.3%, and 86.5%, respectively. The results are accurate even when multiple classes are in close proximity, thus, retaining biological data that would otherwise be discarded due to surface bubble noise.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Open science | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".