MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4383534176 · doi:10.1364/ol.495371

Low-loss grating coupler based on inter-layer mode interference in a hybrid silicon nitride platform

2023· article· en· W4383534176 on OpenAlexaff
Radovan Korček, Pavel Cheben, William Fraser, Jens H. Schmid, Maziyar Milanizadeh, Carlos Alonso-Ramos, Winnie N. Ye, Daniel Benedikovič

Bibliographic record

VenueOptics Letters · 2023
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEngineering
TopicPhotonic and Optical Devices
Canadian institutionsCarleton UniversityNational Research Council Canada
FundersVedecká Grantová Agentúra MŠVVaŠ SR a SAVAgentúra na Podporu Výskumu a Vývoja
KeywordsOpticsMaterials scienceGratingInterference (communication)Silicon nitrideOptoelectronicsLayer (electronics)SiliconDiffraction gratingTelecommunicationsPhysicsComputer scienceNanotechnology

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Surface grating couplers are an important component for interfacing photonic integrated circuits with optical fibers. However, conventional coupler designs typically provide limited performance due to low directionality and poor fiber-to-grating field overlap. The efficiency can be improved by using non-uniform grating structures at the expense of small critical dimensions complicating the fabrication process. While uniform gratings can alleviate this constraint, they produce an exponentially decaying near-field with the Gaussian fiber mode overlap limited to a theoretical maximum of 80%. In this work, we propose a uniform grating coupler that circumvents this field overlap limitation. This is achieved by leveraging inter-layer mode interference through a virtual directional coupler effect in a hybrid amorphous-silicon (α-Si) on silicon nitride (Si 3 N 4 ) platform. By optimizing the inter-layer gap and grating geometry, a near-Gaussian profile of the out-radiated beam is achieved, resulting in an unprecedented grating-to-fiber overlap of 96%. The full three-dimensional (3D) finite-difference time-domain (FDTD) simulations show a high directionality of 84% and a record coupling loss of −1.27 dB with a 1-dB bandwidth of 20 nm for the uniform grating coupler design. Our device is designed for a wavelength of 950 nm aimed for use in hybrid quantum photonic integrated circuits using III-V quantum dot single photon sources.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Simulation or modeling · Consensus signal: Simulation or modeling
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.073
Threshold uncertainty score0.819

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.018
GPT teacher head0.239
Teacher spread0.221 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designSimulation or modeling
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations28
Published2023
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueOptics LettersSame topicPhotonic and Optical DevicesFrench-language works237,207