Untargeted Metabolomic Profiling of Aqueous and Lyophilized Pooled Human Feces from Two Diet Cohorts Using Two-Dimensional Gas Chromatography Coupled with Time-of-Flight Mass Spectrometry
Bibliographic record
Abstract
The metabolic profiles of human feces are influenced by various genetic and environmental factors, which makes feces an attractive biosample for numerous applications, including the early detection of gut diseases. However, feces is complex, heterogeneous, and dynamic with a significant live bacterial biomass. With such challenges, stool metabolomics has been understudied compared to other biospecimens, and there is a current lack of consensus on methods to collect, prepare, and analyze feces. One of the critical steps required to accelerate the field is having a metabolomics stool reference material available. Fecal samples are generally presented in two major forms: fecal water and lyophilized feces. In this study, two-dimensional gas chromatography coupled with time-of-flight mass spectrometry (GC×GC-TOFMS) was used as an analytical platform to characterize pooled human feces, provided by the National Institute of Standards and Technology (NIST) as Research-Grade Test Materials. The collected fecal samples were derived from eight healthy individuals with two different diets: vegans and omnivores, matched by age, sex, and body mass index (BMI), and stored as fecal water and lyophilized feces. Various data analysis strategies were presented to determine the differences in the fecal metabolomic profiles. The results indicate that the sample storage condition has a major influence on the metabolic profiles of feces such that the impact from storage surpasses the metabolic differences from the diet types. The findings of the current study would contribute towards the development of a stool reference material.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".