MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4383555203 · doi:10.1038/s41598-023-36490-w

Transformer-based hand gesture recognition from instantaneous to fused neural decomposition of high-density EMG signals

2023· article· en· W4383555203 on OpenAlexafffund
Mansooreh Montazerin, Elahe Rahimian, Farnoosh Naderkhani, S. Farokh Atashzar, Svetlana Yanushkevich, Arash Mohammadi

Bibliographic record

VenueScientific Reports · 2023
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEngineering
TopicMuscle activation and electromyography studies
Canadian institutionsUniversity of CalgaryConcordia University
FundersNatural Sciences and Engineering Research Council of CanadaMinistère de la Défense Nationale
KeywordsComputer scienceGestureSpeech recognitionTransformerPattern recognition (psychology)Artificial intelligenceEngineeringElectrical engineering

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Designing efficient and labor-saving prosthetic hands requires powerful hand gesture recognition algorithms that can achieve high accuracy with limited complexity and latency. In this context, the paper proposes a Compact Transformer-based Hand Gesture Recognition framework referred to as [Formula: see text], which employs a vision transformer network to conduct hand gesture recognition using high-density surface EMG (HD-sEMG) signals. Taking advantage of the attention mechanism, which is incorporated into the transformer architectures, our proposed [Formula: see text] framework overcomes major constraints associated with most of the existing deep learning models such as model complexity; requiring feature engineering; inability to consider both temporal and spatial information of HD-sEMG signals, and requiring a large number of training samples. The attention mechanism in the proposed model identifies similarities among different data segments with a greater capacity for parallel computations and addresses the memory limitation problems while dealing with inputs of large sequence lengths. [Formula: see text] can be trained from scratch without any need for transfer learning and can simultaneously extract both temporal and spatial features of HD-sEMG data. Additionally, the [Formula: see text] framework can perform instantaneous recognition using sEMG image spatially composed from HD-sEMG signals. A variant of the [Formula: see text] is also designed to incorporate microscopic neural drive information in the form of Motor Unit Spike Trains (MUSTs) extracted from HD-sEMG signals using Blind Source Separation (BSS). This variant is combined with its baseline version via a hybrid architecture to evaluate potentials of fusing macroscopic and microscopic neural drive information. The utilized HD-sEMG dataset involves 128 electrodes that collect the signals related to 65 isometric hand gestures of 20 subjects. The proposed [Formula: see text] framework is applied to 31.25, 62.5, 125, 250 ms window sizes of the above-mentioned dataset utilizing 32, 64, 128 electrode channels. Our results are obtained via 5-fold cross-validation by first applying the proposed framework on the dataset of each subject separately and then, averaging the accuracies among all the subjects. The average accuracy over all the participants using 32 electrodes and a window size of 31.25 ms is 86.23%, which gradually increases till reaching 91.98% for 128 electrodes and a window size of 250 ms. The [Formula: see text] achieves accuracy of 89.13% for instantaneous recognition based on a single frame of HD-sEMG image. The proposed model is statistically compared with a 3D Convolutional Neural Network (CNN) and two different variants of Support Vector Machine (SVM) and Linear Discriminant Analysis (LDA) models. The accuracy results for each of the above-mentioned models are paired with their precision, recall, F1 score, required memory, and train/test times. The results corroborate effectiveness of the proposed [Formula: see text] framework compared to its counterparts.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Bench or experimental · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.002
Threshold uncertainty score0.006

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.001
Open science0.0010.000
Research integrity0.0000.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0020.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.016
GPT teacher head0.230
Teacher spread0.214 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designBench or experimental
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations68
Published2023
Admission routes2
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueScientific ReportsSame topicMuscle activation and electromyography studiesFrench-language works237,207