MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4383559154 · doi:10.46235/1028-7221-10759-iop

Involvement of PAR2 in inflammatory mediator release from human blood eosinophils

2023· article· en· W4383559154 on OpenAlexaff
Xinyu Hu, Haoyang Wang

Bibliographic record

VenueRussian Journal of Immunology · 2023
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldMedicine
TopicBlood Coagulation and Thrombosis Mechanisms
Canadian institutionsUniversité Laval
Fundersnot available
KeywordsInflammationReceptorProteasesCell biologyChemistryProtease-activated receptorCytokineProinflammatory cytokineSignal transductionDownregulation and upregulationTumor necrosis factor alphaImmunologyBiologyBiochemistryPlateletThrombinEnzyme

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Proteinase Activated Receptors (PARs) are the members of G-protein-coupled receptor family and can be cleaved by certain serine proteases to expose a tethered ligand domain, which binds and activates the receptors to initiate multiple signaling cascades. There is some evidence that certain proteases may regulate target cells by activating PARs. There are many studies, in which PARs play important roles in inflammation. One study indicated that PAR2 inhibition and deletion significantly suppressed the degree of inflammation due to decreased IL-6 and IL-1 levels. Another study also showed that PARs activation could mediate reactive oxygen species production and MAPK signaling leading to alveolar inflammation. In addition, platelet-derived CAPN1 can trigger the vascular inflammation associated with diabetes via cleavage of PAR1 and the release of TNF from the endothelial cell surface, and sarsasapogenin may alleviate diabetic nephropathy by the downregulation of PAR1. Another Phellodendron amurense bark extract can suppress the particulate matter-induced Ca2+ influx caused by direct action upon PAR2, alleviating inflammation and maintaining homeostatic levels of cell adhesion components. There are also other two antagonists of I-287 and GB88, which can reduce the PAR2-mediated inflammatory reaction. In this study, we tested expression of PARs and IL-5, IL-6, RANTES and ECP release from human blood eosinophils using different enzymes and PAR agonists. The expression of PARs was assessed in human blood eosinophils by flow cytometry and RT-PCR, and the levels of cytokine and eosinophil cationic protein (ECP) in the cultured supernatants were determined with ELISA kits. Flow cytometry shows that human eosinophils express PAR2 protein and do not express PAR1, PAR3 and PAR4 proteins. RT-PCR analysis revealed expression of PAR2 and PAR3 genes in human eosinophils. Tryptase, trypsin and elastase can induce significant IL-5, IL-6 and ECP release. Trypsin and elastase may also stimulate RANTES secretion, but tryptase cannot induce the RANTES secretion. Tryptase, trypsin and elastase-induced cytokine and ECP release from human blood eosinophils most likely occurs via activation of PAR2.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Bench or experimental · Consensus signal: Bench or experimental
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.002
Threshold uncertainty score0.006

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0020.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.023
GPT teacher head0.272
Teacher spread0.249 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designBench or experimental
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations1
Published2023
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueRussian Journal of ImmunologySame topicBlood Coagulation and Thrombosis MechanismsFrench-language works237,207