Bibliographic record
Abstract
Mondegreen is a common phenomenon during conversation and is more obvious during listening to songs. To simulate the impression that the audience will have when they hear a particular piece, the Soramiminet model is introduced in this paper. The model is a combination of wave2vec, and transformer used for generating misheard lyrics in Chinese with various input songs. This article will focus more on the establishment of the dataset for wave2vec model. The criteria and several methods of creating a high-quality dataset are summarized and present in this paper. Additionally, the negative impact of a defective dataset and how to avoid it is discussed. The main limitations and biases of this dataset, and how to address them and future work are explored. The dataset includes a set of audio clips from 21 tracks by 9 different singers in AVI form and a text file for annotation which can be processed by python dataset module. The dataset is relatively biased, since all the annotations are done by the author personally. There is no “correct” labelling, given that the model is generating misheard or “wrong” results.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".