Impact of Different Potting Media on Growth of Rough Lemon (Citrus Jambhiri Lush)
Bibliographic record
Abstract
IntroductionC itrus is an important group of fruits of subtropical and tropical regions.This plant is characterized by its slow growth rate and commercially it is reproduced through grafting or budding on seedling rootstocks.At the national level in Pakistan, 95% of citrus is produced in Punjab and out of which 70% is kinnow (Chaudhry et al., 2004).Growing media are an important component for horticultural crop production.The substrates elevate Abstract | This study aimed to compare the effects of potting media with different compositions on growth of rough lemon (Citrus jambhiri L) rootstock.Potting media has vital role in the production of healthy and vigorous plants in the nursery.The trial was designed with seven treatment combinations of growing substrates that was five times repeated for each treatment in Completely Randomized Design (CRD).The rough lemon rootstock was tested for growth with all different types of media as T 1 = Soil + silt + sand (2:1:1), T 2 = Rice husk + sand + soil (2:1:1), T 3 = Bagass + sand + soil (2:1:1), T 4 = Wheat straw + sand + soil (2:1:1), T 5 = Rice husk + sand + soil (1:1:2), T 6 = Bagass + sand + soil (1:1:2) and T 7 = Wheat straw + sand + soil (1:1:2) respectively.The observation was recorded for plant height, stem thickness, number of branches, number of leaves, fresh plant weight, dry plant weight, fresh root weight, dry root weight, root length, root diameter, leaf area and chlorophyll contents.The results from this study indicated that in term of stem thickness(2.98mm),more no. of leaves (15), root fresh weight (1.39g), root length (25.5 cm), No. of branches (4) root diameter (4.47 mm) and maximum chlorophyll contents were observed in T1.Overall various potting media concentrations significantly influenced all the growth parameters of rough lemon citrus rootstock.The growing substances comprising Soil + silt + sand (2:1:1), and Rice husk + sand + soil (2:1:1), shows the prominently significant impact on rough lemon, in contrast to others media.In this experiment, an eight-month-old seedling of uniform height were used.The container was a 14′′x8′′ size plastic bag.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Open science | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.002 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".