Bibliographic record
Abstract
Microglia play an important role in the course of ICH (Intracerebral Hemorr-Hage), and its activation degree, phenotypic polarization, hematoma clearance mechanism and its interaction with nerve cells are hot topics in ICH research at present. In this paper, ICH was taken as an example, and the research progress of microglia function changes after ICH was summarized, and the phenotypic transformation of microglia was summarized. The nitrite peroxide produced by M1 microglia in the immune reaction externalizes the phosphoacyl serine residues outside the nerve cells and sends out phagocytic signals, so that microglia can play the role of brain phagocytosis and cause nerve cell damage. The expression of pro-inflammatory microglia (M1 type) and repair microglia (M2 type) increased, and the microglia were mainly M1 type. In addition, the expression of M1 microglia in ICH 72 h group was lower than that in ICH 24 h group, while the expression of M2 microglia in ICH72 h group was higher than that in ICH 24 h group. Compared with Sham group, the increasing trend of M1 microglia expression after ICH is consistent with the increasing trend of TLR4/NF-κ B.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.002 | 0.001 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".