MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4383571076 · doi:10.11834/jrs.20187126

Monitoring snow depth based on the SNR signal of GLONASS satellites

2018· article· en· W4383571076 on OpenAlexaboutno aff
Wei Zhou, Lilong Liu, Liangke Huang, Junyu LI, Jun Chen, Fade Chen, Yin XING, Linbo LIU

Bibliographic record

VenueNational Remote Sensing Bulletin · 2018
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEarth and Planetary Sciences
TopicCryospheric studies and observations
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsGLONASSGNSS applicationsGlobal Positioning SystemRemote sensingGeodesyMultipath propagationSatellite systemReflectometrySatelliteReal Time KinematicGeologyComputer sciencePhysicsTelecommunicationsAstronomy

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

利用GNSS-MR(Global Navigation Satellite System Multipath Reflectometry)技术反演积雪深度是近年来一种新兴的卫星遥感技术。目前大多数研究仅使用GPS(Global Position System)数据限制了该技术的发展,为了扩展GNSS-MR算法的应用,介绍了基于GNSS-MR算法的雪深反演模型。首先,通过多项式拟合分解GLONASS观测数据获取高精度的信噪比残差序列;然后,利用Lomb-Scargle谱分析法对其进行频谱分析可解算雪深值。选取IGS中心的YEL2站2015年11月到2016年6月共243天的GLONASS卫星L1波段反射信号的SNR数据进行实例分析,并以美国国家气象数据中心提供的加拿大Y-H (Yellowknife Henderson)气象站的实测雪深数据为真值,将反演雪深与实测雪深进行对比验证。所得实验结果如下:(1) 与GPS卫星的反演值相比,基于GLONASS-MR (GLONASS Multipath Reflectometry)技术反演积雪深度的精度同样能达到厘米级,RMSE仅3.3 cm,反演值与实测值的空间分布趋势一致且相关性较强,其相关系数R2高达0.969;(2) 不同的积雪深度对信噪比的振幅频率与垂直反射距离具有直接影响;(3) 对同一卫星而言,信噪比的频谱振幅强度峰值与其对应的反演值存在线性相关;(4) 在相同条件下,采用多颗GLONASS卫星数据比单颗GLONASS卫星数据反演雪深的效果明显更优。基于反演的高时间分辨率产品,分析该地区雪深日变化的情况,实验结果表明基于陆基CORS站的GLONASS-MR技术在用于实时、连续的雪深变化监测方面具有良好的潜力和可行性。

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: Observational
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.007
Threshold uncertainty score0.013

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0010.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0010.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.039
GPT teacher head0.248
Teacher spread0.209 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designObservational
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations5
Published2018
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueNational Remote Sensing BulletinSame topicCryospheric studies and observationsFrench-language works237,207