Active Learning with Contrastive Pre-training for Facial Expression Recognition
Why this work is in the frame
A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Deep learning has played a significant role in the success of facial expression recognition (FER), thanks to large models and vast amounts of labelled data. However, obtaining labelled data requires a tremendous amount of human effort, time, and financial resources. Even though some prior works have focused on reducing the need for large amounts of labelled data using different unsupervised methods, another promising approach called active learning is barely explored in the context of FER. This approach involves selecting and labelling the most representative samples from an unlabelled set to make the best use of a limited 'labelling budget'. In this paper, we implement and study 8 recent active learning methods on three public FER datasets, FER13, RAF-DB, and KDEF. Our findings show that existing active learning methods do not perform well in the context of FER, likely suffering from a phenomenon called 'Cold Start', which occurs when the initial set of labelled samples is not well representative of the entire dataset. To address this issue, we propose contrastive self-supervised pre-training, which first learns the underlying representations based on the entire unlabelled dataset. We then follow this with the active learning methods and observe that our 2-step approach shows up to 9.2% improvement over random sampling and up to 6.7% improvement over the best existing active learning baseline without the pre-training. We will make the code for this study public upon publication at: github.com/ShuvenduRoy/ActiveFER.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it