MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4383645881 · doi:10.1002/mco2.320

Identification of circulating T‐cell immunoglobulin and mucin domain 4 as a potential biomarker for coronary heart disease

2023· article· en· W4383645881 on OpenAlexaff
Mengyao Wang, Ke Gong, Xinran Zhu, Shasha Chen, Jie Zhou, Hui Zhang, Jihong Han, Likun Ma, Yajun Duan

Bibliographic record

VenueMedComm · 2023
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldImmunology and Microbiology
TopicGalectins and Cancer Biology
Canadian institutionsEmergent BioSolutions (Canada)
FundersFundamental Research Funds for the Central UniversitiesTianjin Science and Technology CommitteeNankai UniversityNational Natural Science Foundation of China
KeywordsBiomarkerMucinIdentification (biology)AntibodyCoronary heart diseaseMedicineImmunologyInternal medicineBiologyPathologyGenetics

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Efferocytosis, the process of engulfing and removing apoptotic cells, is attenuated in vulnerable plaques of advanced atherosclerosis. T-cell immunoglobulin and mucin domain 4 (TIMD4) is a recognition receptor protein for efferocytosis that has been implicated in atherosclerosis mouse models. However, the role of serum-soluble TIMD4 (sTIMD4) in coronary heart disease (CHD) remains unknown. In this study, we analyzed serum samples collected from two groups: Group 1 (36 healthy controls and 70 CHD patients) and Group 2 (44 chronic coronary syndrome [CCS]) and 81 acute coronary syndrome [ACS] patients). We found that sTIMD4 levels in patients with CHD were significantly higher than those in healthy controls and were also higher in ACS than in CCS patients. The area under the receiver operating characteristic curve was 0.787. Furthermore, our in vitro results showed that low-density lipoprotein/lipopolysaccharide activated p38 mitogen-activated protein kinase, which in turn enhanced a disintegrin and metalloproteinase 17, resulting in increased secretion of sTIMD4. This impairment of macrophage efferocytosis promoted inflammation. Thus, this study is not only the first identification of a potential novel biomarker of CHD, sTIMD4, but also demonstrated its pathogenesis mechanism, providing a new direction for the diagnosis and treatment of CHD.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.001
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: Observational
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.001
Threshold uncertainty score0.003

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.001
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0010.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0010.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.012
GPT teacher head0.263
Teacher spread0.251 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designObservational
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations5
Published2023
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueMedCommSame topicGalectins and Cancer BiologyFrench-language works237,207