MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4383646650 · doi:10.2172/1988244

Extension of Argonne’s Plant Dynamics Code (PDC) Capabilities to TerraPower Direct-Cycle Supercritical CO2 (“Pascal”) Nuclear Reactor Concept. Final CRADA report

2023· report· en· W4383646650 on OpenAlexaff
A. Moisseytsev, Robert Petroski

Bibliographic record

Venuenot available
Typereport
Languageen
FieldEngineering
TopicHeat transfer and supercritical fluids
Canadian institutionsCascades (Canada)
FundersArgonne National LaboratoryUniversity of ChicagoU.S. Department of Energy
KeywordsPascal (unit)Supercritical fluidNuclear engineeringNational laboratoryExtension (predicate logic)Code (set theory)Computer scienceNuclear physicsProgramming languagePhysicsEngineeringThermodynamicsEngineering physics

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Argonne National Laboratory (the Contractor) and TerraPower, LLC, (the Participant), entered into a Cooperative Research and Development Agreement (CRADA) to extend the Plant Dynamics Code (PDC) to model the Pascal reactor plant. PDC is the system-level computer code developed at Argonne, primarily for design and transient analysis of supercritical carbon dioxide (sCO2) energy conversion systems for various power plants. Pascal is a supercritical carbon dioxide (sCO2)-cooled direct-cycle nuclear power reactor under development by TerraPower. New features were added to the code to model components and systems specific to the Pascal plant and to make the code readily available as a tool for design, control, and safety analysis for this and other direct-cycle power plants. TerraPower provided design information of the Pascal reactor and the requirements for the development of the new PDC features. Argonne modified the PDC capabilities to introduce the new features.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.001
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesMeta-epidemiology (narrow), Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Not applicable · Consensus signal: Not applicable
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.272
Threshold uncertainty score1.000

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.001
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.001
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0020.001
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0010.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0010.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.050
GPT teacher head0.290
Teacher spread0.239 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

Study designNot applicable
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2023
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same topicHeat transfer and supercritical fluidsFrench-language works237,207