New Complete BVR Lightcurves of a Poorly Investigated for NSVS12324385
Bibliographic record
Abstract
In this paper, new complete BVR light curves of a poorly investigated contact binary, NSVS12324385, at the short-period cutoff are presented. Eleven eclipse times are observed in the light curves. An orbital period of P = 0.2313926(5) days is obtained and ephemeris is given by O−C method base on the analysis of all available eclipse times. The variations in the orbital period are investigated to be dp/dt =−4.939971462 (3) × 10−9 days•yr−1. We analyse the light curves of the binary system by using the 2013 version of the Wilson Devinney(WD) code, and obtain the first photometric solution which indicates that NSVS12324385 is a W-type W UMa system with a mass ratio of q = M2/M1 = 2.947 ± 0.001 and a contact degree of f=5.9%. The system has a low inclination of i=66.04° and a temperature difference of 272K between two components. To explain the asymmetry of the light curves, we add a cool spot located near the neck region of the more massive component.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.002 | 0.001 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.002 | 0.001 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".