MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4383682007 · doi:10.35490/ec3.2023.321

Enhancing single-stage excavator activity recognition via knowledge distillation of temporal gradient data

2023· article· en· W4383682007 on OpenAlex

Why this work is in the frame

A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.

affAt least one author lists a Canadian institution in the pinned OpenAlex snapshot.

Bibliographic record

VenueComputing in construction · 2023
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldHealth Professions
TopicOccupational Health and Safety Research
Canadian institutionsConcordia University
Fundersnot available
KeywordsComputer scienceExcavatorDistillationFrame (networking)Construct (python library)Artificial intelligenceActivity recognitionExploitPattern recognition (psychology)Domain knowledgeData miningMachine learningComputer visionEngineering

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Vision-based single-stage construction entity activity recognition methods have been gaining popularity within the construction domain. However, their relatively low per-frame performance necessitates additional post-processing to link the per-frame detection results and construct the corresponding action tubes. To address this problem, this study proposes DIGER, which stands for knowledge DIstillation of temporal Gradient data for Excavator activity Recognition. DIGER is built upon the You Only Watch Once activity recognition method and improves its performance by designing an auxiliary backbone to exploit the complementary information present in the temporal gradient data using knowledge distillation, achieving an activity recognition accuracy of 93.6%.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.002
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.001
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.512
Threshold uncertainty score0.487

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0020.001
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.001
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.253
GPT teacher head0.480
Teacher spread0.227 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it