MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4383683664 · doi:10.58931/cect.2023.2228

Medical management of glaucoma for the pregnant and breastfeeding patient

2023· article· en· W4383683664 on OpenAlexaff
Gurkaran S. Sarohia, Mathew M. Palakkamanil

Bibliographic record

VenueCanadian Eye Care Today · 2023
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldMedicine
TopicGlaucoma and retinal disorders
Canadian institutionsUniversity of Alberta
Fundersnot available
KeywordsMedicineGlaucomaBreastfeedingPregnancyPediatricsPopulationObstetricsOphthalmologyEnvironmental health

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Glaucoma is a progressive optic neuropathy which is relatively uncommon in childbearing age, with a reported prevalence of 0.16% between the ages of 18-40 years. Glaucoma management among pregnant patients presents a challenging scenario to the treating physician. Even with its low prevalence in the United Kingdom, a country-wide survey has revealed that approximately 26% of ophthalmologists reported having treated a pregnant patient with glaucoma. Perhaps due to this low prevalence, 31% of these ophthalmologists reported uncertainty about managing glaucoma in this population. When treating pregnant or breastfeeding patients, one must consider the benefit of treatment for the mother while weighing this against the risks the treatment may pose for the mother and fetus/child. This highlights the importance of having a review which can serve as a reference for physicians when managing glaucoma in pregnant and/or breastfeeding patients.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.003
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Not applicable · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.029
Threshold uncertainty score0.059

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.003
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0010.001
Science and technology studies0.0010.000
Scholarly communication0.0010.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0010.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0020.001

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.008
GPT teacher head0.246
Teacher spread0.238 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designNot applicable
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2023
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueCanadian Eye Care TodaySame topicGlaucoma and retinal disordersFrench-language works237,207