Tissue Acceleration as a Novel Metric for Surgical Performance During Carotid Endarterectomy
Why this work is in the frame
A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.
Bibliographic record
Abstract
BACKGROUND AND OBJECTIVES: Gentle tissue handling to avoid excessive motion of affected fragile vessels during surgical dissection is essential for both surgeon proficiency and patient safety during carotid endarterectomy (CEA). However, a void remains in the quantification of these aspects during surgery. The video-based measurement of tissue acceleration is presented as a novel metric for the objective assessment of surgical performance. This study aimed to evaluate whether such metrics correlate with both surgeons' skill proficiency and adverse events during CEA. METHODS: In a retrospective study including 117 patients who underwent CEA, acceleration of the carotid artery was measured during exposure through a video-based analysis. Tissue acceleration values and threshold violation error frequencies were analyzed and compared among the surgeon groups with different surgical experience (3 groups: novice , intermediate , and expert ). Multiple patient-related variables, surgeon groups, and video-based surgical performance parameters were compared between the patients with and without adverse events during CEA. RESULTS: Eleven patients (9.4%) experienced adverse events after CEA, and the rate of adverse events significantly correlated with the surgeon group. The mean maximum tissue acceleration and number of errors during surgical tasks significantly decreased from novice, to intermediate, to expert surgeons, and stepwise discriminant analysis showed that the combined use of surgical performance factors could accurately discriminate between surgeon groups. The multivariate logistic regression analysis revealed that the number of errors and vulnerable carotid plaques were associated with adverse events. CONCLUSION: Tissue acceleration profiles can be a novel metric for the objective assessment of surgical performance and the prediction of adverse events during surgery. Thus, this concept can be introduced into futuristic computer-aided surgeries for both surgical education and patient safety.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it