The temporal and bi-directional relationship between physical activity and sleep in ambulatory children with cerebral palsy
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Purpose Exploring the temporal and bi-directional relationship between device-based measures of physical activity and sleep in ambulatory children with cerebral palsy (CP).Materials and Methods 24-hour activity data were collected from children with CP (n = 51, 43% girls, mean age (range); 6.8 (3–12) years; Gross Motor Function Classification System levels I to III). Nocturnal sleep parameters and daily physical activity were measured for seven consecutive days and nights using ActiGraph GT3X accelerometers. Linear mixed models were constructed to explore the relationships between sleep and activity.Results Light and moderate-to-vigorous activity were negatively associated with sleep efficiency (SE) (resp. p = 0.04, p = 0.010) and total sleep time (TST) (resp. p = 0.007, p = 0.016) the following night. Sedentary time was positively associated with SE and TST the following night (resp. p = 0.014, p = 0.004). SE and TST were positively associated with sedentary time (resp. p = 0.011, p = 0.001) and negatively with moderate-to-vigorous physical activity (resp. p < 0.001, p = 0.002) the following day. Total bedtime and TST were negatively associated with light physical activity (resp. p = 0.046, p = 0.004) the following day.Conclusions The findings from this study suggest that ambulatory children with CP may not sleep better after physical activity, and vice versa, indicating that the relationship is complex and needs further investigation.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.001 | 0.003 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".