The medical social measurements of conditions of professional activity of vegetable-growers of protected soil
Bibliographic record
Abstract
The working conditions in hothouse farming, medical social possibilities and limitations of prospects of professional longevity affect quality of life of employees and their family members, influencing development of state policy in health care, occupational safety and employment. The article identifies and describes, on the basis of sociological quantitative and qualitative methodology, medical and social problems of modern greenhouse farming. The quality of medical support in this professional field is assessed. The main factors of shortening of length of professional experience are established. The conclusions are made that professional resources of protected soil vegetable-growers are characterized by lacking of special education that to a certain degree is compensated by acquired long-term work experience. The main factors obstructing involvement of employees in this profession are physically hard labor and inconvenient operating conditions. The medical support of professional and labor practices in greenhouse farms is as rule only formal. Prevention and treatment of acquired diseases is implemented mainly in home conditions, in polyclinics of place of residence and in private medical organizations at the employees' own expense. The professional longevity does not cover retirement age by reason of debilitated health because of unhealthy working conditions and wide spectrum of acquired diseases.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.004 | 0.001 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".