MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4383722633 · doi:10.1002/2688-8319.12254

Applying remote sensing for large‐landscape problems: Inventorying and tracking habitat recovery for a broadly distributed Species At Risk

2023· article· en· W4383722633 on OpenAlex
Melanie Dickie, Branislav Hricko, Christopher Hopkinson, Victor Tran, Monica Kohler, Sydney A. Toni, Robert Serrouya, Jahan Kariyeva

Why this work is in the frame

A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.

affAt least one author lists a Canadian institution in the pinned OpenAlex snapshot.

Bibliographic record

VenueEcological Solutions and Evidence · 2023
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEnvironmental Science
TopicRemote Sensing and LiDAR Applications
Canadian institutionsEnvironment and Climate Change CanadaAlberta Biodiversity Monitoring InstituteUniversity of LethbridgeUniversity of Alberta
Fundersnot available
KeywordsLidarHabitatVegetation (pathology)Environmental scienceWoodland caribouThreatened speciesRemote sensingBiodiversityRestoration ecologyEcologyDisturbance (geology)GeographyPhysical geographyGeology

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Abstract Anthropogenic habitat alteration is leading to the reduction of global biodiversity. Consequently, there is an imminent need to understand the state and trend of habitat alteration across broad areas. In North America, habitat alteration has been linked to the decline of threatened woodland caribou. As such, habitat protection and restoration are critical measures to support recovery of self‐sustaining caribou populations. Broad estimates of habitat change through time have set the stage for understanding the status of caribou habitat. However, the lack of updated and detailed data on post‐disturbance vegetation recovery is an impediment to recovery planning and monitoring restoration effectiveness. Advances in remote sensing tools to collect high‐resolution data at large spatial scales are beginning to enable ecological studies in new ways to support ecosystem‐based and species‐based management. We used semi‐automated and manual methodologies to fuse photogrammetry point clouds (PPC) from high‐resolution aerial imagery with wide‐area light detection and ranging (LiDAR) data to quantify vegetation structure (height, density, class) on disturbances associated with caribou declines. We also compared vegetation heights estimated from the semi‐automated PPC‐LiDAR fusion to heights estimated in the field, using stereoscopic interpretation, and using multi‐channel TiTAN LiDAR. Vegetation regrowth was occurring on many of the disturbance types, though there was local variability in the type, height and density of vegetation. Heights estimated using PPC‐LiDAR fusion were highly correlated ( r ≥ 0.87 in all cases) with heights estimated using stereomodels, TiTAN multi‐channel LiDAR and field measurements. We demonstrated that PPC‐LiDAR fusion can be operationalized over large areas to collect comprehensive and consistent vegetation data across landscape levels, providing opportunities to link fine‐resolution remote sensing to landscape‐scale ecological studies. Crucially, these data can be used to estimate rates of habitat recovery at resolutions that are not feasible using more commonly used satellite‐based sensors, bridging the gap between resolution and extent. Such data are needed to achieve effective and efficient habitat monitoring to support caribou recovery efforts, as well as a myriad of additional forest management needs.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.001
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesScience and technology studies
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Other design · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.765
Threshold uncertainty score1.000

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.001
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0020.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.061
GPT teacher head0.272
Teacher spread0.211 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it