MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4383742322 · doi:10.1016/j.kint.2023.06.026

Models of care to address disparities in kidney health outcomes for First Nations people

2023· article· en· W4383742322 on OpenAlexaboutno aff
Samantha Bateman, Michael D. Riceman, Kelli Owen, Odette Pearson, Rhanee Lester, Nari Sinclair, Stephen P. McDonald, Martin Howell, David J. Tunnicliffe, Shilpanjali Jesudason

Bibliographic record

VenueKidney International · 2023
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldHealth Professions
TopicGlobal Health Workforce Issues
Canadian institutionsnot available
FundersMedical Research CouncilKidney Health AustraliaAustralian and New Zealand Society of NephrologyNational Health and Medical Research CouncilAmerican Society of Nephrology
KeywordsMedicinePsychological interventionKidney diseaseIndigenousGovernment (linguistics)Health careDisadvantageSocial determinants of healthHealth equityEconomic growthPublic healthPolitical scienceNursingLaw

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

First Nations people of Australia, New Zealand, Canada, and the United States of America (USA) share a common history of European colonisation with forced disconnection from land, community, and culture. While reconciliation strategies differ between the four nations, lasting colonial effects of institutional racism, disproportionate social disadvantage and disparities in health outcomes persist. Decades of consultation with First Nations communities evaluating the problem and government interventions aimed at addressing this disparity have yielded little improvement.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.016
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.034
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Theoretical or conceptual · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.023
Threshold uncertainty score0.085

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0160.034
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.004
Bibliometrics0.0020.002
Science and technology studies0.0010.002
Scholarly communication0.0050.004
Open science0.0030.006
Research integrity0.0030.005
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0100.001

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.063
GPT teacher head0.446
Teacher spread0.383 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designTheoretical or conceptual
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations12
Published2023
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueKidney InternationalSame topicGlobal Health Workforce IssuesFrench-language works237,207