MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4383749884 · doi:10.9781/ijimai.2023.06.004

Spatial-Aware Multi-Level Parsing Network for Human-Object Interaction.

2023· article· en· W4383749884 on OpenAlex

Why this work is in the frame

A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.

affAt least one author lists a Canadian institution in the pinned OpenAlex snapshot.

Bibliographic record

VenueInternational Journal of Interactive Multimedia and Artificial Intelligence · 2023
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEngineering
TopicRobotics and Automated Systems
Canadian institutionsUniversity of Alberta
FundersLiaoning Revitalization Talents ProgramNational Natural Science Foundation of China
KeywordsComputer scienceParsingObject (grammar)Human–computer interactionArtificial intelligence

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Human-Object Interaction (HOI) detection focuses on human-centered visual relationship detection, which is a challenging task due to the complexity and diversity of image content. Unlike most recent HOI detection works that only rely on paired instance-level information in the union range, our proposed Spatial-aware Multilevel Parsing Network (SMPNet) uses a multi-level information detection strategy, including instance-level visual features of detected human-object pair, part-level related features of the human body, and scene-level features extracted by the graph neural network. After fusing the three levels of features, the HOI relationship is predicted. We validate our method on two public datasets, V-COCO and HICO-DET. Compared with prior works, our proposed method achieves the state-of-the-art results on both datasets in terms of mAProle, which demonstrates the effectiveness of our proposed multi-level information detection strategy.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Simulation or modeling · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.855
Threshold uncertainty score0.764

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.111
GPT teacher head0.361
Teacher spread0.250 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it