MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4383815591 · doi:10.5566/ias.2928

Noise Robust Hyperspectral Image Classification With MNF-Based Edge Preserving Features

2023· article· en· W4383815591 on OpenAlex

Why this work is in the frame

A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.

affAt least one author lists a Canadian institution in the pinned OpenAlex snapshot.

Bibliographic record

VenueImage Analysis & Stereology · 2023
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEngineering
TopicRemote-Sensing Image Classification
Canadian institutionsCanadian Space AgencyConcordia University
Fundersnot available
KeywordsHyperspectral imagingPrincipal component analysisArtificial intelligencePattern recognition (psychology)Noise (video)Cube (algebra)Data cubeComputer scienceComputer visionMathematicsImage (mathematics)Data mining

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Hyperspectral image (HSI) classification is an important topic in remote sensing. In this paper, we improve the principal component analysis (PCA)-based edge preserving features (EPFs) for HSI classification. We select to use minimum noise fraction (MNF) instead of PCA to reduce the dimensionality of the hyperspectral data cube to be classified. We keep all the rest steps from the PCA-based EPFs for HSI classification. Since MNF can preserve fine features of a HSI data cube better than PCA, our new method can outperform PCA-EPFs for HSI classification significantly. Experimental results show that our new method performs better than the PCA-based EPFs under such noisy environment as Gaussian white noise and shot noise. In addition, our MNF+EPFs outperform the PCA+EPFs even when no noise is added to the HSI data cubes for most testing cases, which is very desirable in remote sensing.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesMeta-epidemiology (narrow)
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Simulation or modeling · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.805
Threshold uncertainty score1.000

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.000
Bibliometrics0.0010.003
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.021
GPT teacher head0.247
Teacher spread0.226 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it