MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4383821028 · doi:10.1007/s11368-023-03573-0

Less is more? A novel method for identifying and evaluating non-informative tracers in sediment source mixing models

2023· article· en· W4383821028 on OpenAlexaff
Terry Cox, J. Patrick Laceby, Till Roth, Christine Alewell

Bibliographic record

VenueJournal of Soils and Sediments · 2023
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldAgricultural and Biological Sciences
TopicSoil erosion and sediment transport
Canadian institutionsGovernment of Alberta
FundersUniversität Basel
KeywordsTRACEREnvironmental scienceSoil waterMixing (physics)SedimentSoil scienceGeology

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Abstract Purpose Accelerated soil erosion poses a global hazard to soil health. Understanding soil and sediment behaviour through sediment fingerprinting enables the monitoring and identification of areas with high sediment delivery. Land-use specific sediment source apportionment is increasingly determined using the Bayesian mixing model MixSIAR with compound-specific stable isotopes (CSSI). Here, we investigate CSSIs of fatty acid (FA) tracer selection with a novel method to identify and investigate the effect of non-informative tracers on model performance. Methods To evaluate CSSI tracer selection, mathematical mixtures were generated using source soils (n = 28) from the Rhine catchment upstream of Basel (Switzerland). Using the continuous ranked probability (CRP) skill score, MixSIAR’s performance was evaluated for 11 combinations of FAs and 15 combinations of FAs with δ 15 N as a mixing line offset tracer. A novel scaling and discrimination analysis (SDA) was also developed to identify tracers with non-unique mixing spaces. Results FA only tracer combinations overestimated pasture contributions while underestimating arable contributions. When compared to models with only FA tracers, utilizing δ 15 N to offset the mixing line resulted in a 28% improvement in the CRP skill score. δ 15 N + δ 13 C FA 26 was the optimal tracer set resulting in a 62% model improvement relative to δ 15 N + all δ 13 C FAs. The novel SDA method demonstrated how δ 13 C FA tracers have a non-unique mixing space and thus behave as non-informative tracers. Importantly, the inclusion of non-informative tracers decreased model performance. Conclusions These results indicate that MixSIAR did not handle non-informative CSSI tracers effectively. Accordingly, it may be advantageous to remove non-informative tracers, and where feasible, all combinations and permutations of tracers should be assessed to optimize tracer selection. Application of these tracer selection steps can help improve and advance the performance of sediment fingerprinting models and ultimately aid in improving erosion mitigation and management strategies.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Simulation or modeling · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.725
Threshold uncertainty score0.265

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.126
GPT teacher head0.356
Teacher spread0.231 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designSimulation or modeling
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations11
Published2023
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueJournal of Soils and SedimentsSame topicSoil erosion and sediment transportFrench-language works237,207