MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4383822622 · doi:10.22533/at.ed.2163152304075

Impacts of the Covid-19 Pandemic on the Efficiency of Brazilian Domestic Air Transportation

2023· article· en· W4383822622 on OpenAlexaff
Chenyu Guo

Bibliographic record

VenueScientific Journal of Applied Social and Clinical Science · 2023
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEconomics, Econometrics and Finance
TopicAviation Industry Analysis and Trends
Canadian institutionsUniversity of Waterloo
FundersConselho Nacional de Desenvolvimento Científico e Tecnológico
KeywordsCoronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19)Pandemic2019-20 coronavirus outbreakSevere acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus 2 (SARS-CoV-2)GeographyEnvironmental scienceBusinessVirologyMedicineOutbreakInfectious disease (medical specialty)

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

The Covid-19 pandemic has given rise to broad challenges in the air transportation sector by leading to the closure of borders and imposing restrictive measures taken immediately.At the same time, Brazil struggled to contain and better prepare to deal with the consequences of the pandemic.Given the context, this work aims to analyze the impact of Covid-19 on the efficiency of air transportation sector and evaluating the prospects of its recovery compared to the prepandemic level.The present study makes use of Data Envelopment Analysis methodology seeking to identify the technical efficiency of both passenger and cargo flights.The methodology was applied by adopting relevant input and output indicators.We confirmed the negative impacts on the sector suffered from the pandemic.Cargo flights in Brazilian domestic market experienced a larger loss than passenger flights.Moreover, the study shows the Brazilian market did not perform ideally to prevent impacts of the second wave of Covid-19.For governments and policy makers, they need to carefully consider the effects of policies to be implemented.Our research also provides decision-making factors to organizations and companies related to business performance.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.008
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.001
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: Observational
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.339
Threshold uncertainty score0.720

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0080.001
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.002
Science and technology studies0.0010.002
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.109
GPT teacher head0.363
Teacher spread0.254 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designObservational
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2023
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueScientific Journal of Applied Social and Clinical ScienceSame topicAviation Industry Analysis and TrendsFrench-language works237,207