MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4383823836 · doi:10.15847/cct.31571

Collaborative Workspaces: Shaping the Future of Work, Innovation, and Sustainable Development. Interview to Ignasi Capdevila

2023· article· pt· W4383823836 on OpenAlexaff
Elisabete Tomaz, Ignasi Capdevila

Bibliographic record

VenueCidades, comunidades e território/Cidades comunidades e territórios · 2023
Typearticle
Languagept
FieldBusiness, Management and Accounting
TopicInnovative Approaches in Technology and Social Development
Canadian institutionsHEC Montréal
Fundersnot available
KeywordsWorkspaceSustainable developmentWork (physics)Engineering ethicsKnowledge managementBusinessSociologyEngineering managementProcess managementEngineeringPolitical scienceComputer scienceMechanical engineering

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

His research interests include localized knowledge dynamics, knowledge communities, creativity and innovation management in organizational and urban contexts.Ignasi is currently working on the innovation dynamics in collaborative spaces (like coworking spaces, Fab Labs, makerspaces, hackerspaces, etc.) and on the knowledge dynamics and creative and innovation processes taking place in cities and creative industries.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.008
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.001
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesMeta-epidemiology (narrow), Bibliometrics, Science and technology studies, Scholarly communication, Open science, Research integrity
Consensus categoriesMeta-epidemiology (narrow), Open science, Research integrity
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Not applicable · Consensus signal: Not applicable
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.394
Threshold uncertainty score1.000

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0080.001
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0030.003
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0030.000
Bibliometrics0.0050.028
Science and technology studies0.0050.003
Scholarly communication0.0040.003
Open science0.0050.008
Research integrity0.0020.004
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0010.001

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.032
GPT teacher head0.261
Teacher spread0.228 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; both teacher heads agree on what is shown here.

Study designNot applicable
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2023
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueCidades, comunidades e território/Cidades comunidades e territóriosSame topicInnovative Approaches in Technology and Social DevelopmentFrench-language works237,207