Practice Path of Cultivating Healthy Social Psychology of College Students—Based on the Perspective of Socialist Core Values Education in the Media
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Network Since the media era, the study and life of college students who have been exposed to network infection for a long time are becoming increasingly networked, so it is necessary to pay special attention to the guidance and cultivation of college students' healthy social mentality. Exploring how to enrich the education of college students' socialist core values with the help of the network from the media has become a new era topic of ideological and political work in colleges and universities. This study attempts to clarify the internal logical relationship between healthy social mentality and socialist core values. Based on the analysis of four realistic representations of the influence of the development of network from the media on the negative social mentality of college students, it puts forward educational guidance from strengthening the unity of family, school and society. Starting from four aspects, such as the institutional guarantee of the long-term mechanism for cultivating college students' healthy social mentality, we should take root in the soil of socialist core values, consolidate the foundation for cultivating students' healthy social mentality and cultivate healthy social mentality.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.002 | 0.002 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.004 | 0.008 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.005 | 0.003 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.004 |
| Research integrity | 0.001 | 0.002 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.003 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".