The early Cambrian Emu Bay Shale radiodonts revisited: morphology and systematics
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Two species of Radiodonta (stem-group Euarthropoda) from the Emu Bay Shale (Cambrian Series 2, Stage 4), Kangaroo Island, South Australia, are revised based on new field collections and insights from recent phylogenetic analyses and advances in knowledge of radiodonts globally. Anomalocaris briggsi Nedin, 1995 Nedin, C. (1995). The Emu Bay Shale, a Lower Cambrian fossil Lagerstätten, Kangaroo Island, South Australia. Memoirs of the Association of Australasian Palaeontologists, 18, 31–40. [Google Scholar], the most common Emu Bay Shale radiodont, is designated the type species of a new monotypic genus of Tamisiocarididae, Echidnacaris gen. nov. The less common species, previously identified as Anomalocaris aff. canadensis Whiteaves, 1892 Whiteaves, J. F. (1892). Description of a new genus and species of phyllocarid Crustacea from the Middle Cambrian of Mount Stephen, BC. Canadian Record of Science, 5, 205–208. [Google Scholar], is formally named Anomalocaris daleyae sp. nov. Oral cones are assigned to both Echidnacaris briggsi comb. nov. and A. daleyae based on that of the latter species being found in association with pairs of frontal appendages. The Echidnacaris briggsi oral cone is the best preserved for the family Tamisiocarididae; it is triradial, with three large plates and a more pervasive ornament of nodes than in any other known radiodont. Shared characters of the Echidnacaris and Anomalocaris oral cones add support for a sister group relationship between Tamisiocarididae and Anomalocarididae. Unique eye characters documented in E. briggsi, such as being sessile and encircled by an eye sclerite, are unknown in the other tamisiocaridids, Tamisiocaris and Houcaris, and are tentatively regarded as diagnostic for Echidnacaris. An ovate head element resembling that of Tamisiocaris borealis is assigned to E. briggsi, informed by the sister group relationship between these taxa. Isolated radiodont body flaps and sets of setal blades in the Emu Bay Shale cannot be confidently assigned to a species, although relative abundance suggests that many or most are likely E. briggsi. The inner attachment margin of the body flaps is sharply defined and may represent a suture at which flaps are shed in moulting.http://zoobank.org/urn:lsid:zoobank.org:pub:AEFDB294-AE8F-426D-9805-FC701798A986
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.002 | 0.002 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.001 | 0.003 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Open science | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Research integrity | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.002 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".