Amitié archivée : la documentation de l’intime comme stratégie de dernier recours dans la pratique biographique de France Théoret
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Dans le travail de mémoire effectué pour son amie et collègue, Louky Bersianik, France Théoret se trouve dans une impasse archivistique qui fait écho à l’expérience des féministes lesbiennes et queers qui ne peuvent se fier à des stratégies d’archivage conventionnel et qui se tournent vers la documentation de l’intime pour la transmission de leur héritage. Dans le cas de Théoret, le recours à l’intime constitue plutôt une stratégie de dernier recours, qui pallie les absences résultant des structures hétéronormatives auxquelles elles se sont fiées – l’institution littéraire, la famille biologique et les pratiques archivistiques traditionnelles. L’autrice explore dans le présent article la manière dont les écueils de l’hétérosexualité et les privilèges qu’elle confère dans la construction d’un héritage féministe façonnent le legs de Bersianik.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.004 | 0.006 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.002 | 0.002 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.014 | 0.019 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.009 | 0.005 |
| Open science | 0.001 | 0.004 |
| Research integrity | 0.002 | 0.003 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.011 | 0.002 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".